Eureka Math

The curriculum uses a coherent, mastery-oriented approach with strong focus on grade-level standards. EdReports consistently rated it as meeting expectations for focus and coherence.

Gateway 1 ratings for 'Focus & Coherence — alignment to grade-level math standards, focus on major work of the grade' consistently meet expectations across reviews

The curriculum demonstrates strong balance between conceptual understanding and procedural skills. EdReports consistently rated it as 'Meets Expectations' for rigor and mathematical practices across multiple evaluations.

EdReports gateway ratings show the curriculum meets expectations for 'balance of conceptual understanding, procedural skill, and application' in multiple reviews

The curriculum shows some limitations in teacher support materials. EdReports rated usability as only 'Partially Meets Expectations' in multiple evaluations.

Gateway 3 ratings for 'Usability — teacher supports, assessment, differentiation, technology integration' consistently show 'Partially Meets Expectations'

The curriculum may have some assessment components, but usability ratings suggest limitations in this area.

Gateway 3 usability ratings that include assessment show 'Partially Meets Expectations,' indicating potential gaps

The curriculum appears to include application components as part of its balanced approach to mathematical practices.

EdReports ratings for 'balance of conceptual understanding, procedural skill, and application' suggest word problems are included

Evidence is insufficient to determine the quality and extent of worked examples in the curriculum.

No specific information about worked examples or modeling provided in the available reviews

Evidence is insufficient to evaluate the curriculum's support for direct, explicit instruction methods.

No specific information about instructional approach or teacher-led instruction provided in reviews

Evidence is insufficient to determine how well the curriculum incorporates retrieval practice and spaced review.

Reviews do not mention cumulative review, practice schedules, or retrieval practice components

Evidence is insufficient to assess the curriculum's use of visual models and manipulatives.

Reviews do not provide specific details about visual representations or manipulative use