Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) Integrated

by Mathematics Vision Project

MathGrades 9–12

About This Curriculum

MVP Integrated is an inquiry-based high school mathematics curriculum developed to align with Common Core State Standards, using task-based problem solving and the Comprehensive Mathematics Instruction framework to develop conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.

What makes it unique: Task-based learning with Launch-Explore-Discuss instructional structure; emphasis on mathematical practices and productive struggle; free open educational resources aligned to CCSS

Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) Integrated: Inquiry-Based High School Math Curriculum

Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) Integrated is an open-source, inquiry-based high school mathematics curriculum for grades 9-12 that uses task-based problem solving and the Launch-Explore-Discuss format. The curriculum emphasizes productive struggle and connects algebra and geometry concepts through meaningful classroom tasks aligned with Common Core State Standards.

Best for

High school teachers comfortable with inquiry-based instruction who want an integrated algebra-geometry approach, particularly those seeking Common Core alignment and open-source materials

Evaluation Criteria

3 strengths · 2 concerns · 3 neutral · 1 insufficient evidence

Word ProblemsStrength

The curriculum emphasizes application through meaningful classroom tasks and real-world problem solving. The task-based approach appears to integrate word problems naturally rather than teaching them systematically as a separate skill.

Task-based problem solving approach; 'meaningful classroom tasks' that develop understanding; EdReports confirms application component meets expectations

Visual RepresentationsStrength

The curriculum incorporates visual elements effectively, particularly graphs and visual components that guide thinking. The integrated approach connects algebra and geometry concepts through visual representations.

Learning List notes 'questions with visual elements (graphs) that guide thinking'; curriculum connects algebra and geometry concepts visually

Conceptual Procedural BalanceStrength

The curriculum effectively balances conceptual understanding with procedural fluency according to multiple evaluations. EdReports confirms it meets expectations for rigor and mathematical practices, while evaluators note its focus on teaching students to think mathematically reflects best practices.

EdReports Gateway 2 rating of 'Meets Expectations' for balance of conceptual understanding, procedural skill, and application; MGT evaluation praised the curriculum's balance of procedural fluency with conceptual understanding

Direct InstructionConcern

The curriculum deviates significantly from traditional direct instruction, instead emphasizing teacher-facilitated inquiry through strategic 'teacher moves.' This represents a fundamental shift from explicit instruction approaches.

Launch-Explore-Discuss format; teachers use 'strategic teacher moves' to encourage exploration; described as differing from 'traditional mathematics instruction'

Assessment DiagnosticConcern

Assessment support appears limited, with evaluators specifically recommending additional formative assessment questions. EdReports rated assessment and usability as only partially meeting expectations.

EdReports Gateway 3 rating of 'Partially Meets Expectations' for usability including assessment; MGT evaluation recommended additional 'standards-aligned assessment questions for formative assessment'

Teacher TrainingNeutral

The curriculum provides teacher notes and guidance for implementing the inquiry-based approach, though the complexity of the pedagogical shift may require substantial professional development. Implementation challenges were noted in practice.

Lessons include 'teacher notes'; teachers need to learn 'strategic teacher moves'; MGT evaluation noted need for informational campaigns about curriculum philosophy

Retrieval PracticeNeutral

The curriculum includes structured homework with Ready, Set, and Go components, though specific evidence of systematic retrieval practice and spaced review is limited. Additional practice problems were recommended by evaluators.

Homework organized into Ready, Set, and Go parts; MGT evaluation recommended 'more MVP practice problems' suggesting current practice may be insufficient

Sequencing ApproachNeutral

The curriculum uses a coherent learning progression approach with integrated algebra and geometry concepts. The structure is described as focused and coherent, though some foundational scaffolding may be insufficient for struggling students.

Learning List describes 'learning progressions' with meaningful tasks; curriculum described as 'focused, coherent and rigorous'; MGT evaluation noted scaffolding challenges for some Math 1 students

Worked ExamplesInsufficient Evidence

Evidence for systematic worked examples is limited in the available reviews. The curriculum appears to emphasize student exploration and productive struggle rather than traditional worked example approaches.

Launch-Explore-Discuss format emphasizes student exploration; focus on productive struggle suggests less reliance on worked examples

Review Sources

web_search

Learning List

edreports

EdReports Panel

Gateway 1 Alignment:Meets Expectations
Gateway 2 Alignment:Meets Expectations
Gateway 3 Alignment:Partially Meets Expectations
Key Facts
GradesGrades 9–12
SubjectMath
PedagogyInquiry Based
Faith-BasedNo
FormatDigital + Physical
PricingFree core materials; supplemental materials and answer keys available for purchase

Looking for something different?

If none of these options feel right, explore a non-traditional approach. Pallas Center offers a unique curriculum, or design your own with Palladay.

Data sources: edreports