McGraw-Hill Illustrative Mathematics AGA

The curriculum shows coherent sequencing aligned to grade-level standards. Focus is maintained on major mathematical work at each grade level.

Gateway 1 rating of 'Meets Expectations' for focus and coherence demonstrates alignment to grade-level standards and appropriate focus on major work

The curriculum demonstrates strong balance between conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. EdReports confirmed it meets expectations for rigor and mathematical practices.

Gateway 2 rating of 'Meets Expectations' for rigor and mathematical practices indicates appropriate balance of conceptual understanding, procedural skill, and application

The curriculum includes application components as part of its balanced approach to mathematical practices. Real-world problem-solving is addressed.

Gateway 2 confirmation of appropriate balance including 'application' suggests systematic attention to word problems and real-world contexts

The curriculum provides teacher supports that meet evaluation standards. Professional development materials appear adequate.

Gateway 3 rating of 'Meets Expectations' for usability includes evaluation of teacher supports and guidance

The curriculum appears to support effective instruction practices. Strong usability ratings suggest adequate teacher guidance.

Gateway 3 rating of 'Meets Expectations' for usability indicates the curriculum provides teacher supports that facilitate instruction

Assessment components are present and meet usability standards. Specific diagnostic capabilities cannot be determined from available information.

Gateway 3 rating includes assessment as a component that meets expectations, though specific diagnostic features are not detailed

Cannot determine the extent of worked examples usage from available evidence.

EdReports gateways do not specifically address worked examples or cognitive load reduction strategies

Cannot determine the extent of retrieval practice and spaced review from available evidence.

EdReports gateways do not specifically address cumulative review or retrieval practice strategies

Cannot assess the curriculum's use of visual models and representations from available information.

No specific mention of visual representations, manipulatives, or concrete-representational-abstract progression in the EdReports summary